Wharton or Tavernier?
On projected points alone, Tavernier is ahead by 19.0 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Wharton
Crystal Palace · MID · £5.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 18.8
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 0.7%
- Points this season
- 23
- Minutes
- 706
Set-piece taker
Tavernier
Bournemouth · MID · £6.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 37.8
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 18.6%
- Points this season
- 52
- Minutes
- 660
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Wharton is owned by 0.7% of managers, against 18.6% for Tavernier.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Wharton | Tavernier | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 3.1 | 6.3 | −3.2 |
| 10 | 3.0 | 6.3 | −3.3 |
| 11 | 3.3 | 6.3 | −3.0 |
| 12 | 3.4 | 5.8 | −2.3 |
| 13 | 2.9 | 6.3 | −3.4 |
| 14 | 3.1 | 6.9 | −3.8 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them