Stach or Lewis-Potter?
On projected points alone, Stach is ahead by 2.0 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Stach
Leeds · MID · £6.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.6
- Chance of starting
- 89%
- Owned by
- 2.8%
- Points this season
- 19
- Minutes
- 270
Set-piece taker
Lewis-Potter
Brentford · MID · £5.5m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 25.6
- Chance of starting
- 88%
- Owned by
- 2.1%
- Points this season
- 18
- Minutes
- 267
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Lewis-Potter is owned by 2.1% of managers, against 2.8% for Stach.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Stach | Lewis-Potter | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 5.3 | 4.3 | +1.1 |
| 5 | 4.9 | 4.2 | +0.8 |
| 6 | 3.8 | 3.9 | −0.1 |
| 7 | 4.4 | 4.2 | +0.3 |
| 8 | 4.6 | 4.6 | level |
| 9 | 4.6 | 4.6 | level |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them