Stach or Gibbs-White?
On projected points alone, Gibbs-White is ahead by 5.3 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Stach
Leeds · MID · £6.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.6
- Chance of starting
- 89%
- Owned by
- 2.8%
- Points this season
- 19
- Minutes
- 270
Set-piece taker
Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID · £7.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 32.9
- Chance of starting
- 92%
- Owned by
- 9.4%
- Points this season
- 18
- Minutes
- 270
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Stach is owned by 2.8% of managers, against 9.4% for Gibbs-White.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Stach | Gibbs-White | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 5.3 | 4.8 | +0.5 |
| 5 | 4.9 | 6.3 | −1.4 |
| 6 | 3.8 | 5.3 | −1.6 |
| 7 | 4.4 | 5.2 | −0.8 |
| 8 | 4.6 | 5.8 | −1.3 |
| 9 | 4.6 | 5.3 | −0.8 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them