Gannon-Doak or Rice?
On projected points alone, Rice is ahead by 27.0 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Gannon-Doak
Bournemouth · MID · £4.8m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 4.4
- Chance of starting
- 23%
- Owned by
- 0.1%
- Points this season
- 7
- Minutes
- 85
Rice
Arsenal · MID · £7.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 31.4
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 12.4%
- Points this season
- 39
- Minutes
- 670
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Gannon-Doak is owned by 0.1% of managers, against 12.4% for Rice.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Gannon-Doak | Rice | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 0.7 | 4.7 | −4.0 |
| 10 | 0.7 | 6.1 | −5.4 |
| 11 | 0.7 | 5.2 | −4.4 |
| 12 | 0.7 | 5.0 | −4.3 |
| 13 | 0.7 | 5.2 | −4.4 |
| 14 | 0.8 | 5.2 | −4.4 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them