Gannon-Doak or Ødegaard?
On projected points alone, Ødegaard is ahead by 28.4 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Gannon-Doak
Bournemouth · MID · £4.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 3.5
- Chance of starting
- 21%
- Owned by
- 0.1%
- Points this season
- 2
- Minutes
- 2
Ødegaard
Arsenal · MID · £6.7m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 31.9
- Chance of starting
- 90%
- Owned by
- 16.8%
- Points this season
- 24
- Minutes
- 221
The answer nobody else gives you
Gannon-Doak is owned by 0.1% of managers, against 16.8% for Ødegaard.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Gannon-Doak | Ødegaard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.6 | 5.2 | −4.6 |
| 5 | 0.6 | 5.2 | −4.6 |
| 6 | 0.6 | 6.1 | −5.6 |
| 7 | 0.6 | 5.2 | −4.5 |
| 8 | 0.6 | 5.6 | −5.0 |
| 9 | 0.6 | 4.7 | −4.0 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them