White or Konsa?
On projected points alone, White is ahead by 2.3 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
White
Arsenal · DEF · £5.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 25.0
- Chance of starting
- 84%
- Owned by
- 4.6%
- Points this season
- 42
- Minutes
- 532
Konsa
Arsenal · DEF · £4.7m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 22.7
- Chance of starting
- 73%
- Owned by
- 20.2%
- Points this season
- 39
- Minutes
- 551
The answer nobody else gives you
White is owned by 4.6% of managers, against 20.2% for Konsa.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | White | Konsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 3.8 | 3.4 | +0.4 |
| 10 | 4.8 | 4.4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | 4.1 | 3.7 | +0.4 |
| 12 | 4.0 | 3.6 | +0.4 |
| 13 | 4.1 | 3.7 | +0.4 |
| 14 | 4.1 | 3.7 | +0.4 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them