White or Van Hecke?
On projected points alone, Van Hecke is ahead by 1.6 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
White
Arsenal · DEF · £5.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 21.4
- Chance of starting
- 82%
- Owned by
- 4.3%
- Points this season
- 32
- Minutes
- 442
Van Hecke
Spurs · DEF · £4.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 23.0
- Chance of starting
- 93%
- Owned by
- 6.7%
- Points this season
- 31
- Minutes
- 630
The answer nobody else gives you
White is owned by 4.3% of managers, against 6.7% for Van Hecke.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | White | Van Hecke | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 3.3 | 4.1 | −0.9 |
| 10 | 4.1 | 3.6 | +0.5 |
| 11 | 3.5 | 4.1 | −0.6 |
| 12 | 3.5 | 3.6 | −0.1 |
| 13 | 3.5 | 4.1 | −0.6 |
| 14 | 3.5 | 3.5 | level |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them