Saka or Rogers?
On projected points alone, Rogers is ahead by 30.2 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Saka
Arsenal · MID · £9.5m
Thigh injury - Unknown return date
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 0.0
- Chance of starting
- 0%
- Owned by
- 9.1%
- Points this season
- 37
- Minutes
- 596
Set-piece taker
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 30.2
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 50.0%
- Points this season
- 41
- Minutes
- 700
The answer nobody else gives you
Saka is owned by 9.1% of managers, against 50.0% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Saka | Rogers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 0.0 | 4.8 | −4.8 |
| 10 | 0.0 | 4.9 | −4.9 |
| 11 | 0.0 | 5.2 | −5.2 |
| 12 | 0.0 | 4.9 | −4.9 |
| 13 | 0.0 | 5.7 | −5.7 |
| 14 | 0.0 | 4.8 | −4.8 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them