Nørgaard or Rice?
On projected points alone, Rice is ahead by 28.4 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Nørgaard
Everton · MID · £4.8m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 1.6
- Chance of starting
- 10%
- Owned by
- 0.0%
- Points this season
- 0
- Minutes
- 5
Rice
Arsenal · MID · £7.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 30.0
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 12.5%
- Points this season
- 39
- Minutes
- 670
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Nørgaard is owned by 0.0% of managers, against 12.5% for Rice.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Nørgaard | Rice | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 0.3 | 4.5 | −4.2 |
| 10 | 0.3 | 5.8 | −5.5 |
| 11 | 0.3 | 5.0 | −4.7 |
| 12 | 0.3 | 4.8 | −4.6 |
| 13 | 0.3 | 5.0 | −4.7 |
| 14 | 0.3 | 5.0 | −4.7 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them