Calvert-Lewin or Mateta?
On projected points alone, Calvert-Lewin is ahead by 19.0 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Calvert-Lewin
Leeds · FWD · £6.1m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 26.5
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 21.4%
- Points this season
- 35
- Minutes
- 683
Set-piece taker
Mateta
Crystal Palace · FWD · £6.3m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 7.5
- Chance of starting
- 32%
- Owned by
- 1.2%
- Points this season
- 5
- Minutes
- 152
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Mateta is owned by 1.2% of managers, against 21.4% for Calvert-Lewin.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Calvert-Lewin | Mateta | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.3 | 1.2 | +3.0 |
| 10 | 4.9 | 1.2 | +3.7 |
| 11 | 3.9 | 1.3 | +2.6 |
| 12 | 4.9 | 1.4 | +3.5 |
| 13 | 3.6 | 1.1 | +2.4 |
| 14 | 4.9 | 1.2 | +3.7 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them