Calvert-Lewin or Marmoush?
On projected points alone, Calvert-Lewin is ahead by 6.9 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Calvert-Lewin
Leeds · FWD · £6.1m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 26.5
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 21.3%
- Points this season
- 35
- Minutes
- 683
Set-piece taker
Marmoush
Spurs · FWD · £7.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 19.6
- Chance of starting
- 75%
- Owned by
- 2.2%
- Points this season
- 20
- Minutes
- 513
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Marmoush is owned by 2.2% of managers, against 21.3% for Calvert-Lewin.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Calvert-Lewin | Marmoush | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.3 | 3.5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | 4.9 | 3.0 | +1.9 |
| 11 | 3.9 | 3.5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | 4.9 | 3.0 | +1.9 |
| 13 | 3.6 | 3.5 | level |
| 14 | 4.9 | 3.0 | +2.0 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them