Mason-Clark or Schade?
On projected points alone, Schade is ahead by 18.1 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Mason-Clark
Coventry City · MID · £5.3m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 9.0
- Chance of starting
- 63%
- Owned by
- 0.1%
- Points this season
- 10
- Minutes
- 326
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.1
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 15.0%
- Points this season
- 42
- Minutes
- 604
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Mason-Clark is owned by 0.1% of managers, against 15.0% for Schade.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Mason-Clark | Schade | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 1.5 | 4.9 | −3.4 |
| 10 | 1.5 | 4.2 | −2.7 |
| 11 | 1.6 | 4.9 | −3.3 |
| 12 | 1.5 | 4.2 | −2.7 |
| 13 | 1.6 | 4.5 | −2.9 |
| 14 | 1.4 | 4.5 | −3.0 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them