Ampadu or Schade?
On projected points alone, Schade is ahead by 11.2 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Ampadu
Leeds · MID · £5.3m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 17.6
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 0.8%
- Points this season
- 25
- Minutes
- 720
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 28.8
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 15.1%
- Points this season
- 42
- Minutes
- 604
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Ampadu is owned by 0.8% of managers, against 15.1% for Schade.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Ampadu | Schade | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2.9 | 5.2 | −2.4 |
| 10 | 3.2 | 4.4 | −1.3 |
| 11 | 2.7 | 5.2 | −2.5 |
| 12 | 3.2 | 4.4 | −1.3 |
| 13 | 2.5 | 4.7 | −2.2 |
| 14 | 3.2 | 4.7 | −1.6 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them