Ampadu or Tavernier?
On projected points alone, Tavernier is ahead by 20.7 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Ampadu
Leeds · MID · £5.3m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 17.1
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 0.8%
- Points this season
- 25
- Minutes
- 720
Tavernier
Bournemouth · MID · £6.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 37.8
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 19.1%
- Points this season
- 52
- Minutes
- 660
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Ampadu is owned by 0.8% of managers, against 19.1% for Tavernier.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Ampadu | Tavernier | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2.8 | 6.3 | −3.5 |
| 10 | 3.1 | 6.3 | −3.3 |
| 11 | 2.6 | 6.3 | −3.6 |
| 12 | 3.1 | 5.8 | −2.7 |
| 13 | 2.5 | 6.3 | −3.8 |
| 14 | 3.1 | 6.9 | −3.8 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them