Ampadu or Cherki?
On projected points alone, Cherki is ahead by 14.1 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Ampadu
Leeds · MID · £5.3m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 17.6
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 0.8%
- Points this season
- 25
- Minutes
- 720
Cherki
Man City · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 31.7
- Chance of starting
- 73%
- Owned by
- 38.8%
- Points this season
- 44
- Minutes
- 437
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Ampadu is owned by 0.8% of managers, against 38.8% for Cherki.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Ampadu | Cherki | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2.9 | 5.6 | −2.7 |
| 10 | 3.2 | 5.1 | −2.0 |
| 11 | 2.7 | 6.2 | −3.5 |
| 12 | 3.2 | 4.1 | −0.9 |
| 13 | 2.5 | 5.6 | −3.0 |
| 14 | 3.2 | 5.1 | −2.0 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them