Konsa or Van Hecke?
On projected points alone, Van Hecke is ahead by 2.3 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Konsa
Arsenal · DEF · £4.7m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 22.7
- Chance of starting
- 73%
- Owned by
- 20.0%
- Points this season
- 39
- Minutes
- 551
Van Hecke
Spurs · DEF · £4.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 25.0
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 7.4%
- Points this season
- 38
- Minutes
- 720
The answer nobody else gives you
Van Hecke is owned by 7.4% of managers, against 20.0% for Konsa.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Konsa | Van Hecke | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 3.4 | 4.5 | −1.1 |
| 10 | 4.4 | 3.9 | +0.5 |
| 11 | 3.7 | 4.5 | −0.7 |
| 12 | 3.6 | 3.9 | −0.3 |
| 13 | 3.7 | 4.5 | −0.7 |
| 14 | 3.7 | 3.8 | level |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them