Quenda or Tavernier?
On projected points alone, Tavernier is ahead by 33.6 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Quenda
Chelsea · MID · £5.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 4.2
- Chance of starting
- 21%
- Owned by
- 0.0%
- Points this season
- 6
- Minutes
- 99
Tavernier
Bournemouth · MID · £6.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 37.8
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 17.9%
- Points this season
- 52
- Minutes
- 660
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Quenda is owned by 0.0% of managers, against 17.9% for Tavernier.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Quenda | Tavernier | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 0.7 | 6.3 | −5.6 |
| 10 | 0.7 | 6.3 | −5.7 |
| 11 | 0.7 | 6.3 | −5.5 |
| 12 | 0.7 | 5.8 | −5.1 |
| 13 | 0.8 | 6.3 | −5.5 |
| 14 | 0.7 | 6.9 | −6.2 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them