Armstrong or Rogers?
On projected points alone, Rogers is ahead by 15.2 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Armstrong
Everton · MID · £5.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 15.0
- Chance of starting
- 93%
- Owned by
- 0.3%
- Points this season
- 23
- Minutes
- 697
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 30.2
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 50.0%
- Points this season
- 41
- Minutes
- 700
The answer nobody else gives you
Armstrong is owned by 0.3% of managers, against 50.0% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Armstrong | Rogers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2.4 | 4.8 | −2.3 |
| 10 | 2.6 | 4.9 | −2.2 |
| 11 | 2.4 | 5.2 | −2.8 |
| 12 | 2.4 | 4.9 | −2.5 |
| 13 | 2.4 | 5.7 | −3.3 |
| 14 | 2.6 | 4.8 | −2.1 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them