Barnes or Gibbs-White?
On projected points alone, Gibbs-White is ahead by 11.9 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Barnes
Newcastle · MID · £6.1m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 23.3
- Chance of starting
- 91%
- Owned by
- 4.7%
- Points this season
- 28
- Minutes
- 450
Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 35.2
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 16.0%
- Points this season
- 30
- Minutes
- 446
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Barnes is owned by 4.7% of managers, against 16.0% for Gibbs-White.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Barnes | Gibbs-White | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 4.1 | 5.8 | −1.8 |
| 7 | 4.0 | 5.7 | −1.6 |
| 8 | 3.8 | 6.4 | −2.6 |
| 9 | 4.0 | 5.8 | −1.8 |
| 10 | 3.8 | 5.7 | −1.9 |
| 11 | 3.7 | 5.8 | −2.1 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.28 points per player per gameweek over the last 4. How we calculate them