Philogene or Ødegaard?
On projected points alone, Ødegaard is ahead by 28.8 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Philogene
Ipswich Town · MID · £5.4m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 4.1
- Chance of starting
- 22%
- Owned by
- 0.1%
- Points this season
- 1
- Minutes
- 28
Ødegaard
Arsenal · MID · £6.7m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 32.9
- Chance of starting
- 90%
- Owned by
- 18.6%
- Points this season
- 27
- Minutes
- 305
The answer nobody else gives you
Philogene is owned by 0.1% of managers, against 18.6% for Ødegaard.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Philogene | Ødegaard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.7 | 5.2 | −4.5 |
| 6 | 0.7 | 6.1 | −5.4 |
| 7 | 0.6 | 5.2 | −4.6 |
| 8 | 0.7 | 5.6 | −4.9 |
| 9 | 0.7 | 4.7 | −4.0 |
| 10 | 0.7 | 6.1 | −5.4 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.30 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them