Bogle or van Ewijk?
On projected points alone, Bogle is ahead by 16.4 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Bogle
Leeds · DEF · £4.8m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.8
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 11.2%
- Points this season
- 50
- Minutes
- 630
van Ewijk
Coventry City · DEF · £3.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 11.4
- Chance of starting
- 83%
- Owned by
- 7.3%
- Points this season
- 15
- Minutes
- 630
The answer nobody else gives you
van Ewijk is owned by 7.3% of managers, against 11.2% for Bogle.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | van Ewijk | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.5 | 1.9 | +2.5 |
| 10 | 5.2 | 1.9 | +3.3 |
| 11 | 4.1 | 2.0 | +2.1 |
| 12 | 5.2 | 1.9 | +3.3 |
| 13 | 3.7 | 2.0 | +1.7 |
| 14 | 5.2 | 1.8 | +3.4 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them