Lerma or Schade?
On projected points alone, Schade is ahead by 21.2 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Lerma
Crystal Palace · MID · £4.8m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 5.9
- Chance of starting
- 31%
- Owned by
- 0.1%
- Points this season
- 10
- Minutes
- 159
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.1
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 15.0%
- Points this season
- 42
- Minutes
- 604
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Lerma is owned by 0.1% of managers, against 15.0% for Schade.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Lerma | Schade | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 1.0 | 4.9 | −3.9 |
| 10 | 1.0 | 4.2 | −3.2 |
| 11 | 1.0 | 4.9 | −3.9 |
| 12 | 1.1 | 4.2 | −3.1 |
| 13 | 0.9 | 4.5 | −3.5 |
| 14 | 1.0 | 4.5 | −3.5 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them