Andersen or De Cuyper?
On projected points alone, De Cuyper is ahead by 31.0 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Andersen
Fulham · DEF · £5.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 5.1
- Chance of starting
- 31%
- Owned by
- 0.2%
- Points this season
- 3
- Minutes
- 190
De Cuyper
Brighton · DEF · £5.3m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 36.1
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 42.6%
- Points this season
- 60
- Minutes
- 670
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Andersen is owned by 0.2% of managers, against 42.6% for De Cuyper.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Andersen | De Cuyper | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 0.8 | 4.8 | −3.9 |
| 10 | 0.9 | 6.4 | −5.6 |
| 11 | 0.8 | 6.5 | −5.8 |
| 12 | 0.9 | 6.4 | −5.6 |
| 13 | 0.8 | 6.0 | −5.1 |
| 14 | 0.8 | 6.0 | −5.1 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them