Andersen or Calafiori?
On projected points alone, Calafiori is ahead by 17.6 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Andersen
Fulham · DEF · £5.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 10.5
- Chance of starting
- 65%
- Owned by
- 0.1%
- Points this season
- 2
- Minutes
- 180
Calafiori
Arsenal · DEF · £5.8m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 28.1
- Chance of starting
- 89%
- Owned by
- 48.7%
- Points this season
- 22
- Minutes
- 236
The answer nobody else gives you
Andersen is owned by 0.1% of managers, against 48.7% for Calafiori.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Andersen | Calafiori | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.7 | 4.6 | −2.9 |
| 5 | 1.7 | 4.6 | −2.8 |
| 6 | 1.8 | 5.4 | −3.6 |
| 7 | 1.9 | 4.6 | −2.7 |
| 8 | 1.8 | 4.9 | −3.1 |
| 9 | 1.7 | 4.2 | −2.5 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them