King or Rogers?
On projected points alone, Rogers is ahead by 4.8 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
King
Fulham · MID · £5.5m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 25.3
- Chance of starting
- 88%
- Owned by
- 1.1%
- Points this season
- 19
- Minutes
- 270
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £7.6m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 30.1
- Chance of starting
- 92%
- Owned by
- 32.1%
- Points this season
- 19
- Minutes
- 257
The answer nobody else gives you
King is owned by 1.1% of managers, against 32.1% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | King | Rogers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3.8 | 5.6 | −1.8 |
| 5 | 4.0 | 4.8 | −0.8 |
| 6 | 4.5 | 5.1 | −0.7 |
| 7 | 4.8 | 4.8 | level |
| 8 | 4.5 | 5.1 | −0.7 |
| 9 | 3.8 | 4.7 | −0.9 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them