Lewis-Potter or Tavernier?
On projected points alone, Tavernier is ahead by 9.1 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Lewis-Potter
Brentford · MID · £5.5m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 24.9
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 1.9%
- Points this season
- 35
- Minutes
- 625
Set-piece taker
Tavernier
Bournemouth · MID · £6.3m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 34.0
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 16.3%
- Points this season
- 52
- Minutes
- 660
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Lewis-Potter is owned by 1.9% of managers, against 16.3% for Tavernier.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Lewis-Potter | Tavernier | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.5 | 5.6 | −1.1 |
| 10 | 3.9 | 5.7 | −1.9 |
| 11 | 4.5 | 5.6 | −1.1 |
| 12 | 3.9 | 5.2 | −1.4 |
| 13 | 4.1 | 5.6 | −1.5 |
| 14 | 4.1 | 6.2 | −2.1 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them