Schade or Gibbs-White?
On projected points alone, Schade is ahead by 2.0 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.1
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 15.1%
- Points this season
- 42
- Minutes
- 604
Set-piece taker
Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID · £7.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 25.1
- Chance of starting
- 86%
- Owned by
- 12.0%
- Points this season
- 32
- Minutes
- 630
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Gibbs-White is owned by 12.0% of managers, against 15.1% for Schade.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Schade | Gibbs-White | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.9 | 4.1 | +0.8 |
| 10 | 4.2 | 4.0 | +0.2 |
| 11 | 4.9 | 4.1 | +0.8 |
| 12 | 4.2 | 4.0 | +0.2 |
| 13 | 4.5 | 4.5 | level |
| 14 | 4.5 | 4.4 | level |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them