Schade or Gibbs-White?
On projected points alone, Gibbs-White is ahead by 8.6 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 24.6
- Chance of starting
- 89%
- Owned by
- 3.9%
- Points this season
- 30
- Minutes
- 357
Set-piece taker
Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID · £7.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 33.2
- Chance of starting
- 92%
- Owned by
- 9.5%
- Points this season
- 26
- Minutes
- 360
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Schade is owned by 3.9% of managers, against 9.5% for Gibbs-White.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Schade | Gibbs-White | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 4.0 | 6.3 | −2.3 |
| 6 | 3.8 | 5.3 | −1.6 |
| 7 | 4.0 | 5.2 | −1.2 |
| 8 | 4.4 | 5.8 | −1.4 |
| 9 | 4.4 | 5.3 | −1.0 |
| 10 | 4.1 | 5.2 | −1.1 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them