Schade or Rogers?
On projected points alone, Rogers is ahead by 1.4 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 28.8
- Chance of starting
- 94%
- Owned by
- 15.1%
- Points this season
- 42
- Minutes
- 604
Set-piece taker
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 30.2
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 50.0%
- Points this season
- 41
- Minutes
- 700
The answer nobody else gives you
Schade is owned by 15.1% of managers, against 50.0% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Schade | Rogers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 5.2 | 4.8 | +0.5 |
| 10 | 4.4 | 4.9 | −0.5 |
| 11 | 5.2 | 5.2 | level |
| 12 | 4.4 | 4.9 | −0.5 |
| 13 | 4.7 | 5.7 | −1.0 |
| 14 | 4.7 | 4.8 | level |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.21 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them