Schade or Bobb?
On projected points alone, Schade is ahead by 3.7 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.1
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 15.0%
- Points this season
- 42
- Minutes
- 604
Set-piece taker
Bobb
Fulham · MID · £5.5m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 23.4
- Chance of starting
- 95%
- Owned by
- 0.4%
- Points this season
- 30
- Minutes
- 575
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Bobb is owned by 0.4% of managers, against 15.0% for Schade.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Schade | Bobb | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.9 | 3.9 | +1.0 |
| 10 | 4.2 | 4.2 | level |
| 11 | 4.9 | 3.3 | +1.6 |
| 12 | 4.2 | 4.2 | level |
| 13 | 4.5 | 3.9 | +0.5 |
| 14 | 4.5 | 3.9 | +0.5 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them