Schade or Janelt?
On projected points they are within 0.7 of each other over six gameweeks — close enough that points are not the thing that should decide it.
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 24.6
- Chance of starting
- 89%
- Owned by
- 3.7%
- Points this season
- 23
- Minutes
- 312
Set-piece taker
Janelt
Brentford · MID · £5.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 25.3
- Chance of starting
- 88%
- Owned by
- 2.4%
- Points this season
- 22
- Minutes
- 315
The answer nobody else gives you
Janelt is owned by 2.4% of managers, against 3.7% for Schade.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Schade | Janelt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 4.0 | 4.1 | level |
| 6 | 3.8 | 3.8 | level |
| 7 | 4.0 | 4.1 | level |
| 8 | 4.4 | 4.6 | −0.1 |
| 9 | 4.4 | 4.5 | −0.1 |
| 10 | 4.1 | 4.2 | −0.1 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them