Schade or Ibrahim?
On projected points alone, Schade is ahead by 24.6 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Schade
Brentford · MID · £6.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 24.6
- Chance of starting
- 89%
- Owned by
- 4.8%
- Points this season
- 30
- Minutes
- 357
Set-piece taker
Ibrahim
Brighton · MID · £4.5m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 0.0
- Chance of starting
- —
- Owned by
- 0.0%
- Points this season
- 0
- Minutes
- 0
The answer nobody else gives you
Ibrahim is owned by 0.0% of managers, against 4.8% for Schade.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Schade | Ibrahim | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 4.0 | — | +4.0 |
| 6 | 3.8 | — | +3.8 |
| 7 | 4.0 | — | +4.0 |
| 8 | 4.4 | — | +4.4 |
| 9 | 4.4 | — | +4.4 |
| 10 | 4.1 | — | +4.1 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.30 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them