Ødegaard or Rogers?
On projected points alone, Rogers is ahead by 2.6 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Ødegaard
Arsenal · MID · £6.7m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 26.3
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 16.5%
- Points this season
- 50
- Minutes
- 823
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £8.2m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 28.9
- Chance of starting
- 97%
- Owned by
- 53.9%
- Points this season
- 52
- Minutes
- 880
The answer nobody else gives you
Ødegaard is owned by 16.5% of managers, against 53.9% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Ødegaard | Rogers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 4.4 | 5.0 | −0.6 |
| 12 | 4.3 | 5.1 | −0.8 |
| 13 | 4.0 | 5.5 | −1.5 |
| 14 | 4.4 | 4.5 | −0.2 |
| 15 | 4.7 | 3.9 | +0.8 |
| 16 | 4.7 | 5.0 | −0.3 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.13 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them