Ødegaard or Lavia?
On projected points alone, Ødegaard is ahead by 16.3 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Ødegaard
Arsenal · MID · £6.7m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 31.9
- Chance of starting
- 90%
- Owned by
- 16.8%
- Points this season
- 24
- Minutes
- 221
Lavia
Chelsea · MID · £5.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 15.6
- Chance of starting
- 88%
- Owned by
- 0.2%
- Points this season
- 9
- Minutes
- 190
The answer nobody else gives you
Lavia is owned by 0.2% of managers, against 16.8% for Ødegaard.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Ødegaard | Lavia | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 5.2 | 2.8 | +2.4 |
| 5 | 5.2 | 2.5 | +2.6 |
| 6 | 6.1 | 2.6 | +3.5 |
| 7 | 5.2 | 2.5 | +2.6 |
| 8 | 5.6 | 2.6 | +2.9 |
| 9 | 4.7 | 2.5 | +2.2 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them