Gibbs-White or Rogers?
On projected points alone, Gibbs-White is ahead by 2.8 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID · £7.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 32.9
- Chance of starting
- 92%
- Owned by
- 9.4%
- Points this season
- 18
- Minutes
- 270
Set-piece taker
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £7.6m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 30.1
- Chance of starting
- 92%
- Owned by
- 33.2%
- Points this season
- 19
- Minutes
- 257
The answer nobody else gives you
Gibbs-White is owned by 9.4% of managers, against 33.2% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Gibbs-White | Rogers | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4.8 | 5.6 | −0.8 |
| 5 | 6.3 | 4.8 | +1.5 |
| 6 | 5.3 | 5.1 | +0.2 |
| 7 | 5.2 | 4.8 | +0.4 |
| 8 | 5.8 | 5.1 | +0.7 |
| 9 | 5.3 | 4.7 | +0.7 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them