Gibbs-White or Janelt?
On projected points alone, Gibbs-White is ahead by 7.6 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID · £7.9m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 32.9
- Chance of starting
- 92%
- Owned by
- 9.4%
- Points this season
- 18
- Minutes
- 270
Set-piece taker
Janelt
Brentford · MID · £5.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 25.3
- Chance of starting
- 88%
- Owned by
- 2.2%
- Points this season
- 21
- Minutes
- 270
The answer nobody else gives you
Janelt is owned by 2.2% of managers, against 9.4% for Gibbs-White.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Gibbs-White | Janelt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4.8 | 4.2 | +0.6 |
| 5 | 6.3 | 4.1 | +2.2 |
| 6 | 5.3 | 3.8 | +1.5 |
| 7 | 5.2 | 4.1 | +1.1 |
| 8 | 5.8 | 4.6 | +1.3 |
| 9 | 5.3 | 4.5 | +0.8 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.29 points per player per gameweek over the last 3. How we calculate them