Rogers or Neto?
On projected points they are within 0.0 of each other over six gameweeks — close enough that points are not the thing that should decide it.
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.7
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 50.1%
- Points this season
- 41
- Minutes
- 700
Neto
Chelsea · MID · £6.6m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.7
- Chance of starting
- 85%
- Owned by
- 4.2%
- Points this season
- 37
- Minutes
- 591
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Neto is owned by 4.2% of managers, against 50.1% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Rogers | Neto | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.4 | 4.3 | level |
| 10 | 4.5 | 4.5 | level |
| 11 | 4.8 | 4.8 | level |
| 12 | 4.5 | 4.5 | level |
| 13 | 5.2 | 5.3 | level |
| 14 | 4.4 | 4.3 | level |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them