Rogers or Timber?
On projected points alone, Rogers is ahead by 18.8 over the next six gameweeks. That is not the whole answer.
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.7
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 50.2%
- Points this season
- 41
- Minutes
- 700
Timber
Crystal Palace · MID · £5.0m
Hamstring injury - 75% chance of playing
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 8.9
- Chance of starting
- 47%
- Owned by
- 0.0%
- Points this season
- 17
- Minutes
- 388
The answer nobody else gives you
Timber is owned by 0.0% of managers, against 50.2% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Rogers | Timber | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.4 | 1.5 | +2.9 |
| 10 | 4.5 | 1.4 | +3.0 |
| 11 | 4.8 | 1.6 | +3.2 |
| 12 | 4.5 | 1.6 | +2.9 |
| 13 | 5.2 | 1.4 | +3.8 |
| 14 | 4.4 | 1.5 | +2.9 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them