Rogers or Cherki?
On projected points they are within 0.7 of each other over six gameweeks — close enough that points are not the thing that should decide it.
Rogers
Chelsea · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 27.7
- Chance of starting
- 96%
- Owned by
- 50.1%
- Points this season
- 41
- Minutes
- 700
Cherki
Man City · MID · £8.0m
- Projected, next 6 GW
- 28.4
- Chance of starting
- 75%
- Owned by
- 38.4%
- Points this season
- 44
- Minutes
- 437
Set-piece taker
The answer nobody else gives you
Cherki is owned by 38.4% of managers, against 50.1% for Rogers.
If you are chasing someone in your mini-league, the less-owned player is usually the right pick even when he projects slightly lower — points from a player your rival also owns cancel out and cannot close the gap. If you are defending a lead, take the one your rival already has: matching them removes their chance to gain on you.
Global ownership is only a proxy. What actually matters is whether the specific people in your league own him.
Check who owns them in my leagueProjected by gameweek
| GW | Rogers | Cherki | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 4.4 | 5.0 | −0.6 |
| 10 | 4.5 | 4.6 | −0.1 |
| 11 | 4.8 | 5.5 | −0.7 |
| 12 | 4.5 | 3.7 | +0.8 |
| 13 | 5.2 | 5.0 | +0.2 |
| 14 | 4.4 | 4.6 | −0.2 |
Projections are ours, not FPL's. Measured error 1.19 points per player per gameweek over the last 5. How we calculate them